Harvey v. City Finance Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBloodwoetii, J.
1. The court properly overruled tlxe demurrer to the petition.
(а) The assignment, a,copy of which is attached to the petition, is not an assignment of “an undivided interest in wages.” See, in this connection, Central of Ga. Ry. Co. v. King, 137 Ga. 369 (73 S. E. 632).
(б) The name “City Finance Company” imports a corporation. Weller v. Davis, 15 Ga. App. 79 (82 S. E. 593), and cit. See also Mattox v. State, 115 Ga. 212 (7) (41 S. E. 709).
*421Decided April 15, 1930. Rehearing denied May 23, 1930. E. F. Goodrum, J. L. B. Boyd, for plaintiff in error. Luther V. Bloodworth, contra..2. The act…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mattox v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Lynch v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Shippey Bros. v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. King Bros. & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Weller v. Davis & Sanford Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
3Cited by1 opinion
- London Iron & Metal Co. v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975