Legal Opinion

Denoble v. Denoble

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 28, 1938No. Appeals, 84 and 85PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Barnes,

The plaintiff instituted this proceeding in equity for the reinstatement of two judgments which she alleges were satisfied by her husband in fraud of her marital rights. On July 6, 1935, the husband of plaintiff, Clxerubmo DeNoble, the owner of two judgments of record in the court below in his favor against his son, John DeNoble and his daughter-in-law, Mary DeNoble, caused both judgments to be marked satisfied. Plaintiff averred in the bill that no consideration was given for the satisfaction of the judgments, but on the contrary the defendants colluded to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Windolph v. Girard Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. Beirne v. Continental-Equitable Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Orth v. DoenchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rynier EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Cancilla v. BondySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Montague EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Geary v. GearySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Kirk v. KirkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API