Legal Opinion

21SA308

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 21, 2022No. 22CO14Published

1Opinion of the Court

related to an ineffective assistance claim, the allegedly ineffective counsel must produce the requested information without undue delay. Second, the court holds that the procedures set forth in Crim. P. 35(c)(3)(V) in no way modify section 18-1-417. No provision in Crim. P. 35(c)(3)(V) mentions section 18-1-417 or deals with attorney-client confidentialities. Contrary to one of the contentions advanced in this case, the scope of the statutory waiver is contingent on the nature of the ineffective assistance claim lodged, not on any action taken by the court pursuant to Crim. P. 35(c)(3)(V).…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hunt v. BlackburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Lawrence S. Bittaker v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, California State Prison of San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Cowen v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
  4. The People of the State of Colorado v. Benjamin WeeksSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
  5. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. v. District Court for the City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API