Burtscher v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtVinje, C. J.
Defendant assigned three errors: First, that the findings of the jury were not sustained by the evidence under the law; second, that the court erred in admitting evidence offered by the plaintiff over the objections of the defendant; third, that the sentence is excessive. He relies as to the first assignment of error upon the case of Doscher v. State, 194 Wis. 67, 214 N. W. 359. We think the case *648comes squarely within the rule announced in Ring v. State, 192 Wis. 391, 212 N. W. 662, and not within the Doscher Case. And therefore we hold that the first assignment of error is not well taken.
The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Doscher v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Ring v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927