Legal Opinion

State v. Redd

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 28, 2001No. A00A1059PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eldridge, Judge.

On December 17, 1999, we granted interlocutory review to the State, which appealed from the trial court’s denial of its motion to disqualify attorney Charles Reddick from the representation of criminal defendants — including appellee Mark Allen Redd — because Charles Reddick is a district attorney pro tempore.* 1 The State *313claimed that the trial court’s order conflicted with OCGA §§ 15-18-10 (d) and 15-18-21 (a), as well as with ethical proscriptions against dual representation which result in a per se conflict of interest. Based on the State’s position, the trial court’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Polito v. HollandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  2. Fullwood v. SivleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  3. Elmore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  4. State v. ReddCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  2. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API