Legal Opinion

Browning v. Goldman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 15, 1901PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from an order of the General Term of the City Court of the city of New York, affirming an order denying the plaintiffs motion for a retaxation of costs.

1Per curiam

This case has been tried three times. Upon the first trial a verdict in favor of the plaintiff was rendered, and upon his motion was set aside on the ground of insufficient damages. Upon the second trial a juror was withdrawn at defendants’ request to enable them to apply at Special Term for leave to amend the answer. The third trial resulted in a verdict for plaintiff for the full amount. The clerk taxed only two trial fees issues of fact. A motion for a retaxation was denied, and upon appeal to the General Term of the City Court from the order entered upon this decision, the said order was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gilroy v. BadgerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
  2. Hudson v. Erie RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chism v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Holloway v. FrensdorfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API