Sweeny v. Stapleton

*214OPINION

By LIEGHLEY, PJ.

My conclusion reached after a full examination of the record, briefs and authorities cited and read is:

“Decree for defendants for the reason that the obligations assumed by the purchase contract justified the Council in authorizing the payment by ordinance of said sum to partially meet and be within the rate of pay fixed by the arbitrators as a potential contractual liability and as the justifiable payment of a valid moral claim.”

In the first place, it should be noted and emphasized that there is no tax money involved in this lawsuit. It concerns the assets and earnings…