Herbold Laboratory, Inc. And Milton Herbold v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ELY, Circuit Judge:
The Federal Trade Commission issued, in 1951, a Cease and Desist Order di recting appellants to refrain from advertising that their product “Herbold Pomade” was capable of restoring a user’s hair to its “former natural shade or color.” 1 In 1965, the Government instituted suit in the District Court, seeking the imposition of civil penalties authorized by the Federal Trade Commission Act, § 5(1). 15 U.S.C. § 45(l). The action was grounded upon certain alleged violations by appellants of the Order. The District Court imposed fines totaling $3,500.00 upon finding that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Mitchell v. Robert DeMario Jewelry, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- State of Alabama v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- United States v. Herbold Laboratory, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1967
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Beatrice Foods Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- Presidio Enterprises, Inc. v. Warner Bros. Distributing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Beatrice Foods CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1972
- United States v. Itt Continental Baking CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Presidio Enterprises, Inc. v. Warner Bros. Distributing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.