Application of the United States, for an Order Compelling Earl J. Carroll, to Comply With an Internal Revenue Summons
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEDINA, Circuit Judge.
Appellant, an American citizen, lived and practiced law in Germany for most of the time from 1946 to 1954. During-that period, he numbered among his clients Alfred Krupp von Bohlen and' Halbaek, and Frederick Flick, the German industrialists. He may have; earned a substantial amount of money from his practice, but he reported none, claiming to be within the exemption of Section 116 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 (substantially re-enacted I.R.C.1954, Section 911, 26 U.S.C.A. § 911), which applies to wages, salaries, professional fees and other amounts received as…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Endicott Johnson Corp. v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Falsone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Martin v. Chandis Securities Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- United States v. United Distillers Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Grant Foster and Foster Construction C.A., Intervenors-Appellants v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- De Masters v. ArendCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Cameron O'connor, Alias v. John A. O'connell, District Director of Providence District, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1958
- United States v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- United States Holding Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1965
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.