Legal Opinion
Jamieson v. Roman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 30, 2007PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Blydenburgh, J.), dated September 16, 2005, as denied those branches of his motion which were pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (1) and 3012 (d) to vacate his default in appearing or answering the complaint and to extend his time to serve an answer.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
*862A defendant who has failed to timely appear or answer the complaint must provide a reasonable excuse for the default and demonstrate a meritorious…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Antoine v. BeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Ennis v. LemaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Lipp v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Wayasamin v. WayasaminAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Conner v. ConnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Maspeth Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. McGownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Maspeth Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. McGowanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. GutierrezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. GutierrezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013