Claim of Laduke v.Martin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtBliss, J.
Both the claimant and his employer are agreed that he was a farm laborer and all the evidence in this record sustains this fact. The employee’s claim for compensation states that his regular occupation was “ farm work ” and the nature of the employer’s business was a “ farm.” The employer’s first report of injury gives the nature of his business as “ farm ” and the place where the accident occurred as “ barn ” and also states that the claimant was employed as a “ farmhand.” The employer was a farmer and uninsured. The claimant himself testified that his employer’s business was that of a…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Davis v. McKinneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
- Claim of Pestlin v. Haxton Canning Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948