Legal Opinion

Claim of Laduke v.Martin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 5, 1941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBliss, J.

Both the claimant and his employer are agreed that he was a farm laborer and all the evidence in this record sustains this fact. The employee’s claim for compensation states that his regular occupation was “ farm work ” and the nature of the employer’s business was a “ farm.” The employer’s first report of injury gives the nature of his business as “ farm ” and the place where the accident occurred as “ barn ” and also states that the claimant was employed as a “ farmhand.” The employer was a farmer and uninsured. The claimant himself testified that his employer’s business was that of a…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davis v. McKinneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Claim of Pestlin v. Haxton Canning Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API