Legal Opinion

In Re Summary Proceedings Against Gerlich

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 30, 1931No. Nos. 28,518, 28,519PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Herman Richter and Dora Richter, his wife, by separate petitions, instituted under G. S. 1923 (1 Mason, 1927) § 5696, brought their attorney, George H. Gerlich, Jr. before the court to account for and turn over certain moneys he had received for them. There was an extended hearing and full findings of fact made in favor of the petitioners. George H. Gerlich, Jr. moved for amended findings or new trials. From the orders denying the motions he appeals.

Counsel for appellant frankly admits that the “record presents no questions of law except such as arise under the statute giving the appellant…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Liles v. LilesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. In Re Disbarment of George H. Gerlich, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. Northern National Bank v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API