Legal Opinion

Scott v. E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1989No. 89-127PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Turnage

Floyd Scott brought this suit under a theory of strict liability, claiming that exposure to defendant’s paint caused his respiratory disability. A jury in the District Court for the Thirteenth Judicial District, Yellowstone County, entered a verdict for defendant. Scott appeals. We affirm.

The issues are:

1. Did the trial court err in refusing to allow Scott to take the deposition of defense counsel?

2. Did the trial court err in excluding from evidence post-accident changes in defendant’s warning labels?

3. Did the trial court err in allowing the opinion testimony of expert witness Bruce Held?

Sco…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of Estate of CountsMontana Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Henricksen v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Hawkins v. HarneyMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Reese v. StantonMontana Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Ferguson v. Ullman Eye Clinic P.C.Montana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Henricksen v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API