Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Bourns, Inc. And Marlan E. Bourns, and Cross-Appellees v. Allen-Bradley Company, and Cross-Appellants

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 17, 1973No. 72-1222, 72-1223Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partPell, Circuit Judge

I concur in the majority opinion insofar as it reverses that part of the judgment of the district court which barred appellants from asserting patent claims other than those explicitly declared invalid in the Dale judgment. However, I respectfully dissent from the balance of the majority opinion.

In considering the contentions of the appellants that the judgment in the District Court of Nebraska does not collaterally estop them as to any claims of the patent asserted in the Northern District of Illinois, the following significant chronology should be kept in mind.

The decision in the Dale case,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API