Succession of Celestin
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
COLE, Judge.
Appellant James Robinson appeals a judgment removing him as administrator of the estate of his late wife, Cedonia Celestin. The issue presented is whether or not the trial court acted properly because of a conflict of interest involving past due alimony. Because we agree with the trial court’s conclusion that there is a serious conflict of interest between Robinson and the succession of Celestin, we affirm.
Exhibits attached to the record show Ce-donia Celestin was granted a judgment of separation from James Robinson on April 22, 1970. Robinson was ordered to pay Celestin $150.00 a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Succession of HoussiereSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
- In Re Mulqueeny's SuccessionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
- Rosenthal v. FrederickLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
3Cited by2 opinions
- Succession of McIntireLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- Succession of McIntireLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001