Peters v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, with costs to defendant, by granting judgment declaring that defendant has no duty to indemnify in connection with the underlying personal injury action and, as so modified, affirmed (see Lanza v Wagner, 11 NY2d 317 [1962], cert denied 371 US 901 [1962]). State Farm demonstrated as a matter of law that the policy exclusion for “bodily injury,” which is either “expected or intended by an insured” or “which is the result of willful and malicious acts of an insured,” precludes coverage of the incident at issue…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lanza v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
3Cited by7 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. SchimmelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Smith v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Automobile Insurance of Hartford v. CookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- National Grange Mutual Insurance v. Utica Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- KEMPER INDEPENDENCE INSURANCE CO. v. ELLIS, LENOREAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.