Legal Opinion
Madderns v. Fox Film Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 19, 1923PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Hinman, J.:
The business of the employer was the manufacture of moving picture films with office and principal place of business in New York city, where most of its pictures were produced. It had employed claimant as an actor. He was engaged at the studio in New York city as a moving picture man and had been employed for about four months prior to the accident.
The State Industrial Board has found: “ On March 1, 1921, while the said Paul Madderns was engaged in the regular course of his employment and while working for his employer on a boat which was tied to Pier 1 at Jersey City, N. J., and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Claim of Smith v. Heine Safety Boiler Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Matter of Newham v. . Chile Exploration Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Danielsen v. . Morse Dry Dock Repair Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Claim of Norman v. Merritt & Chapman Derrick & Wrecking Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Motor Boat Sales, Inc. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941