Parker v. Clark
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Bill in equity to avoid two awards made by an arbitrator, the first under a sealed agreement of submission executed by and between these parties, and the second under a rule of the superior court in an action there pending between them. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChapman, C. J.
It appears that Clark brought an action of tort, in the superior court, against Parker, for pulling down a brick wall which Clark had erected near the westerly end of Gloucester Place in Boston. While the suit was pending, the parties made an agreement under seal. It recites that differences had arisen between them “ as to the ownership and use ” of the place, and Parker claimed that he had “ an interest in the fee of said place,'’ and “ a right to use the same not merely *432as a way in connection with his estate on said place, recently purchased by him of David A. Neal,” “ but also to use the…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Mills v. Board of Conciliation & ArbitrationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Baldwin v. MosesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Kabatchnick v. HoffmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917