Legal Opinion
Vejselovski v. McErlean
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 20, 2011PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant met his prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff Atli Vejselovski (hereinafter the injured plaintiff) did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). The plaintiffs alleged that certain regions of the injured plaintiff’s spine, as well as the injured plaintiffs left shoulder, sustained certain injuries as a result of the subject accident, and the defendant provided competent *1063medical evidence establishing,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Rodriguez v. HuerfanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Kunz v. GleesonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Casas v. MonteroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Paul-Austin v. McPhersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012