Legal Opinion

Daniel v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 22, 1983No. 05-81-01082-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANCE, Justice.

Appeal is from a conviction by a jury for the offense of murder. Punishment was assessed by the court at twenty years. The appellant presents nineteen grounds of error. In addition to the sufficiency of evidence, this court will only address those grounds that are dispositive of the appeal and which might occur in a retrial. We reverse and remand.

In ground of error one the appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict and judgment of guilty. The evidence shows that the appellant met Robert Robinson for the first time on March 5, 1975. Later that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  2. Montgomery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952
  3. Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Aguillar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1949
  5. Cox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Elliott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  2. Rankin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Rankin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API