Legal Opinion · Dissent

Matter of Conservatorship of Sickles

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1994No. Civ. 930174, 930365Published

1Dissent

VERNON R. PEDERSON, Surrogate Judge,

dissenting.

The majority opinion, by adopting a generous view of the statute which grants conservators their authority, has provided for the future an easy remedy for persons that hereafter wish to surreptitiously challenge the validity of a will. The words “except the power to make a will” are not words that grant authority but show a restriction thereof. They should be construed in the light of our long-standing tradition of treating wills with appropriate respect. See, e.g., Tooz v. Tooz, 78 N.D. 432, 50 N.W.2d 61 (1951); Stormon v. Weiss, 65 N.W.2d 475…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stormon v. WeissNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Boone v. Estate of NelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Matter of Estate of PoldaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Matter of Estate of OttoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Matter of Estate of AmbersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API