Bank of Cruger v. Hodge
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion.
Ethridge, J.,
delivered a dissenting opinion.
I think the judgment in this case should be affirmed. The owner does not lose his homestead by a mere temporary absence from it, even a prolonged absence, if it be caused by necessity. The proof here shows that the owner of the homestead had to leave it temporarily, in order to make a living, as he could not secure the furnish or financial aid necessary to the operation of the farm. I do not know a more urgent necessity than to make a living; and everyone knows that from 1932 until the present people have had an extremely…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Campbell v. AdairMississippi Supreme Court · 1871
- Wilson v. GrayMississippi Supreme Court · 1882
- Gilmore v. BrownMississippi Supreme Court · 1908
- Jackson v. ColemanMississippi Supreme Court · 1917
- Tiser v. McCainMississippi Supreme Court · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.