Legal Opinion

Furman v. Furman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 31, 1941PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDore, J.

We think the Special Term properly dismissed the . complaint on the ground that the prior judgment granted on the merits after a trial between the same parties was res judicata. That judgment was unanimously affirmed by this court without opinion (Furman v. Furman, 259 App. Div. 988); motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals or for reargument denied (259 App. Div. 1073); motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals dismissed (284 N. Y. 591). The cause of action forming the basis of the present action at law differs from that asserted in the previous equity suit in that only…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Furman v. KraussNew York Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Furman v. FurmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mallis v. Bankers Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  2. Pattison v. PattisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. Ground Control, LLC v. Capsco Industries, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Richardson v. Shearson/American Express Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  5. Murray v. National Broadcasting CoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API