Legal Opinion

Burns v. Kaylor

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 1, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Barry

delivered the opinion of the court.

Appellee sued to recover $3,000 for damages alleged to have been caused by malpractice. At the trial appellee asked leave to amend her declaration by increasing the ad damnum to $25,000. Appellant objected to the granting of leave hut the objection was overruled. The amendment was never actually made. The trial resulted in a. verdict for $10,000. Appellant, in his motion for a hew trial, called attention to the fact that the verdict was larger than the amount claimed in the declaration. The motion also presented other grounds for a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Condon v. SchoenfeldIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Wisconsin Central Railroad v. WieczorekIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Hinchliffe v. Wenig Teaming Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Tomlinson v. EarnshawIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Sinsheimer v. William Skinner Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Foltz v. HutsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API