Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 15, 1856PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Writ of Error to Independence Oireuii Oowrt„ Hon. Beaufort H. Neely, Ciren.it Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hanly

This was a soi. fa. on forfeited recognizance, determined at the September term of the Independence Circuit Court.

On the 18th day of September, 1854, a judgment of forfeiture was entered; and on the 1st of November, thereafter, a writ of soi. fa. issued, which was returned, executed on Byers and Bat-tan, and non est as to WilUams.

At the September term, 1855, Byers appeared, and craved oyer of the recognizance mentioned in the soi. fa., which was granted, by filing the original recognizance, which is as follows:

STATE OF ARKANSAS,) County oe Independence, f

We, Norman W. "Williams, as principal,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bridge v. FordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
  2. People v. Van EpsNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  3. Commonwealth v. DaggettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1820
  4. M'Carty v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1825

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mayer v. BrensingerIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Fletcher v. Bank of LonokeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1902
  3. Mason v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  4. Beidler v. BeidlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1903
  5. Godby v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API