Legal Opinion

Austin v. Duffer

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 7, 1926No. 1783. [fn*]PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

Prior to and on June 23,1921, the Farmers’ & Merchants’ State Bank, which hereafter, will be referred to as the Farmers’ Bank, and the Texas Bank & Trust Company, which hereafter will be referred to: as the Texas Bank, both incorporated under the banking laws of the state of Texas, were doing business, having their places of business in Ranger, Tex. Both had been sustaining heavy withdrawals of deposits. Neither was in sound condition. The Texas Bank was the weaker of the two. Its officers and directors doubted its ability to continue in, business. The officers and directors of the Farmers’…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Sanger v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Casey v. GalliSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Converse v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Davis v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  2. Orndorff v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Markus v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. Jackson v. Ariton Banking Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  5. Howard v. Republic Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API