Legal Opinion

White v. Mitchell

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 24, 1909No. Civ. No. 584PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Yolo County, denying a writ of mandate. N. A. Hawkins, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

The board of trustees of the city of Woodland approved a claim and ordered a warrant drawn in favor of appellant for fifteen days’ service as a member of the board of equalization of said city at five dollars per day, and respondent refused to issue the warrant, claiming that under an ordinance of said city the work of equalization must be completed within the limit of two weeks. Application was made to the superior court of Yolo county for a writ of mandate to compel respondent to draw said warrant. The -appeal is from the order denying the writ.

The basis for appellant’s contention is found…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Buswell v. Board of Supervisors of Alameda CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Walton v. McPhetridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. State v. Thomas Cruse Savings BankMontana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Payne v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bronough v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API