Legal Opinion
Lapsley v. Sorfin International, Ltd.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 25, 2007PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a hybrid action for a judgment declaring that the value of James Lapsley’s stock in Sorfin International, Ltd, should be determined by fair market value rather than book value as provided for in the parties’ agreement, and proceeding, in effect, pursuant to CPLR article 78 and Business Corporation Law § 624 to compel the production of the books and records of Sorfin International, Ltd, James Lapsley appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Warshawsky, J.), dated February 10, 2006, which (a) denied the petition and granted the motion of Sorfin International, Ltd, to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lanza v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Tatko v. Tatko Brothers Slate Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Glassman v. Louis Shiffman, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Camhe-Marcille v. Sally Lou Fashions Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3Cited by5 opinions
- JAS Family Trust v. Oceana Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Quick v. QuickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- JAS Family Trust v. Oceana Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Novikov v. Oceana Holdings Corp.New York Supreme Court · 2014
- Quick v. QuickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012