Ralston Purina Company v. General Foods Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Per curiam
This appeal is from the District Court’s ruling in a declaratory judgment action that patent No. 3,047,395 (the Ru-soff patent) owned by appellant, General Foods, was invalid and unenforceable and, even if valid, not infringed by the product manufactured or process employed by appellee, Ralston Purina, in the production of its “Chuck Wagon” dog food.
Generally, the patent seeks to protect a product simulating quality meat cuts in appearance and texture. The product is made out of proteinaceous material. Besides the product the patent also attempts to protect the particular process by which…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Amphenol Corporation, a Corporation of Delaware v. General Time Corporation, a Corporation of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
- Deep Welding, Inc. v. Sciaky Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- Application of Hans Theodor BoeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Akron Brass Company v. Elkhart Brass Manufacturing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
- Leishman v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Philips Electronic and Pharmaceutical Industries Corp. v. Thermal and Electronics Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Frito-Lay, Inc. v. So Good Potato Chip CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Flour City Architectural Metals v. Alpana Aluminum Products, Inc., Alpana Aluminum Products, Inc. v. Flour City Architectural MetalsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- The Black & Decker Manufacturing Company v. Ever-Ready Appliance Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Woodstream Corporation v. Herter's, Inc. And George L. HerterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.