Legal Opinion

Walling v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 21, 1921No. 6431PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Criminal District Court of Dallas. Tried below before the Honorable Robert B. Seay. Appeal from a misdemeanor conviction of embezzlement; penalty, a fine of $100 and ten days in the county jail. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HAWKINS, Judge.

Appeal is from a misdemeanor conviction for embezzlement. The punishment assessed was by fine of $100 and ten days confinement in the county jail.

Our Assistant Attorney General suggests that the appeal should be dismissed because no final judgment is shown in the record. The verdict of the jury appears, but if judgment was ever entered thereon the record fails to show it. See Article 853, Vernon’s C. C. P.; Mirelles v. State, 13 Texas Crim. App., 346; Pennington v. State, 11 Texas Crim. App., 281; Foster v. State., 64 Texas Crim. Rep., 531; McCuin v. State, 86 Texas Crim. Rep.,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Foster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  2. McCuin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ellis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API