Legal Opinion
State Compensation Fund v. Superior Court
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 23, 1970No. 2 CA-CIV 819PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
KRUCKER, Judge.
An order of the respondent court denying the State Compensation Fund’s *585motion to dismiss a third party complaint is the subject of review in this special action. Since it is an interlocutory non-appealable order, A.R.S. § 12-2101, as amended; Bloch v. Bentfield, 1 Ariz.App. 412, 403 P.2d 559 (1965), appellate intervention is appropriate when a trial court’s refusal to dismiss constitutes an unauthorized assumption of judicial power. Industrial Commission v. Superior Court in and for County of Pima, 5 Ariz.App. 100, 423 P.2d 375 (1967); Rule 3, Rules of Procedure for Special…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Joe Grasso & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Pan American Fire & Casualty Company v. RevereDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1960
- Industrial Commission v. Superior Court in and for County of PimaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- Riley v. County of CochiseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Bloch v. BentfieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Isaacs v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971