Legal Opinion
Boucher v. Lamanna
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided February 22, 2000No. 4:97-cv-02776PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GWIN, District Judge.
On October 31, 1997, Petitioner Elden Boucher filed a pro se habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. [Doc. 1]. Petitioner Boucher alleges Respondent Warden John LaManna exceeded his statutory authority by improperly denying him early release under 18 U.S.C. § 3621(e). Boucher says two of the Bureau of Prisons’ internal policies implementing the statutory mandate, Program Statements 5162.02 and 5162.04, improperly consider sentencing enhancements as a means of determining whether he may receive early release.
Respondent Warden LaManna contends…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Federal Election Commission v. AkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Leonard Louis Capaldi v. Stephen Pontesso, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cushenberry v. Federal Medical CenterDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2008
- Robin Leiva Lemus v. Robert Lynch, et al.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026