Miro Tool & Mfg., Inc. v. Midland MacHinery, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.
Miro Tool & Mfg., Inc. appeals from a nonfinal order which granted Midland Machinery, Inc.'s motion to reopen a default judgment previously awarded to Miro.1 The trial court ruled that the one-year time limitation of § 806.07(2), Stats., was tolled because of certain representations made by Miro to Midland at a meeting in February 1994. Alternatively, the court held that Miro was estopped by its conduct from asserting the one-year limitation. Miro claims the trial court lacked authority to reopen the judgment after the one-year limitation period. We agree and therefore reverse the trial…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State ex rel. M.L.B. v. D.G.H.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- Goff v. SelderaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
- Rhodes v. TerryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Cynthia M.S. v. Michael F.C.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brown v. LangeAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Brown v. LangeAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Menard, Inc. v. Liteway Lighting ProductsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Menard, Inc. v. Liteway Lighting ProductsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Miro Tool & Mfg., Inc. v. Midland MacHinery, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996