Legal Opinion

State v. Kareski

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 2013No. 2012-1242Published

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State v. Kareski, 137 Ohio St.3d 92,

2013-Ohio-4008.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. KARESKI, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Kareski, 137 Ohio St.3d 92,

2013-Ohio-4008.] Criminal law—Evidence—Trial-court error in taking judicial notice of essential fact—Appellate review—Effect of error on appellate court’s review of sufficiency of evidence for purposes of determining whether retrial is permissible under Double Jeopardy Clause—When erroneous judicial notice fills gap created by prosecution’s failure to prove essential element, judicially noticed fact may not be considered to determine…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API