Seavey v. Laughlin
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Motion for new trial. Action to recover an alleged loan evidenced by a check. The jury gave a verdict for the plaintiff, and the defendant filed a motion for new trial. The case appears in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSpear, J.
This is an action brought by Irene C. Seavey against Matthew Laughlin as administrator of the estate of Maude S. Ober, late of Brewer, in the County of Penobscot- The claim is alleged to be for money loaned September 18, 1895, by said Seavey to said Ober. The evidence of the alleged loan is a cashier’s check. The verdict was for the plaintiff and the case comes up on motion by the defendant.
On the 18th day of September, 1895, Pebecca J. E. Stanley had a deposit in a bank in Brooklyn, New York, in trust, for her daughter, Irene C. Seavey, the plaintiff, and drew upon the deposit a cheek to her…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gates v. HughesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
3Cited by10 opinions
- Keller v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mann's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Town of Glenrock v. AbadieWyoming Supreme Court · 1953
- Ward v. Cumberland County Power & Light Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1936
- Judkins v. BucklandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.