Legal Opinion
Pauyo v. Pauyo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 23, 2013PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for tortious interference with contract, the defendant appeals from an order *848of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Sunshine, Ct. Atty. Ref.), dated February 24, 2011, which granted that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was to appoint Fritz Pauyo as a receiver of her interest in Fito Taxi Service, Inc.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
In an order dated October 7, 2009, a Court Attorney Referee (hereinafter the Referee) determined, after a hearing, that certain documents transferring all outstanding shares of Fito…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Campione v. AlbertiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- McKiernan v. McKiernanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Murray v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Stern v. SternAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Trezza v. TrezzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- MVB Collision, Inc. v. Progressive InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Law Offices of David J. Sutton, P.C. v. NYC Hallways & Lobbies, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Law Offices of David J. Sutton, P.C. v. NYC Hallways & Lobbies, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Matter of Gartmond v. ConwayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017