Legal Opinion
Enzor v. United States
United States Court of Military Appeals
Decided January 15, 1971No. Miscellaneous Docket No. 70-60PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Quinn, Chief Judge:
A general court-martial convened at Fort Hood, Texas, convicted the petitioner of a number of oifenses in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. He contends that the conviction is void under O’Callahan v Parker, 395 US 258, 23 L Ed 2d 291, 89 S Ct 1683 (1969), and United States v Borys, 18 USCMA 547, 40 CMR 259 (1969), because the offenses charged were “cognizable” in a civilian criminal court in Texas and had no element of military significance to justify the exercise of court-martial jurisdiction.
In Mercer v Dillon, 19 USCMA 264, 265, 41 CMR 264 (1970),…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- O'Callahan v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. BorysUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- Mercer v. DillonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
- United States v. ShockleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. GreenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. WheelerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
- Belichesky v. BowmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
- Allen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
- United States v. RoettgerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. KraffaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981