Legal Opinion
McHugh v. TEAMSTERS PENSION TRUST FUND OF PHILA.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 2, 1986No. Civ. A. 84-2680PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LUONGO, Chief Judge.
In 1983, defendant Teamsters Pension Trust Fund denied plaintiff Edward L. McHugh’s application for early retirement benefits. Plaintiffs subsequently brought this action seeking a determination that Edward L., James, Gerard and Christina 1 McHugh are eligible to receive benefits from the Teamsters Pension Trust and Health and Welfare Funds. In the alternative, plaintiffs McHugh Brothers Equipment Corporation and McHugh Brothers Crane Rentals, Inc. seek reimbursement for all contributions made to the Funds on behalf of the individual plaintiffs. Presently before me…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Ruckelshaus v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Central Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- National Labor Relations Board v. Amax Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Ursic v. Bethlehem MinesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Max I. Bittner v. Sadoff & Rudoy IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- George Kwatcher v. Massachusetts Service Employees Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Airco Industrial Gases, Inc. v. The Teamsters Health And Welfare Pension Fund Of Philadelphia And VicinityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Carl Colteryahn Dairy, Inc. v. Western Pennsylvania Teamsters And Employers Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Behnke, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Carl Colteryahn Dairy, Inc. v. Western Pennsylvania Teamsters & Employers Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.