State v. Vlahos
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
Prior to the trial the defendant made a timely motion to dismiss the information upon the basis that the statute, sec. 945.03 (2), 1967, under which he was charged and subsequently convicted, is unconstitutional because of its vagueness. The defendant-appellant also asserts that the only issue on this appeal is whether the statute is unconstitutional and void because of vagueness.
Sec. 945.03 (2), Stats. 1967, provides as follows:
“945.03 Commercial gambling: Whoever intentionally does any of the following may be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than one year or both:
“(2)…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. PetrilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Omernik v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- State Ex Rel. Lynch v. ContaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. CourtneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. WachsmuthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Balistreri v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.