Legal Opinion

Forbes v. Plummer

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 30, 1916PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Tuscaloosa County Court. Heard before Hon. H. B. Foster. Trover by Theodore Plummer against Forbes & Carloss, Carloss as surviving partner, and individually, and one Hardi-son. Judgment for plaintiff and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMayfield, J.

Appellee sued appellants and one Hardison, in trover, for the conversion of one sawmill and attachments, and recovered a judgment for about $1,500, as damages, from-, which judgment defendants appeal.

The general issue and several special pleas were interposed, among which were, res judicata, the statute of limitations of six: years and a plea in the nature of recoupment or mitigation of" damages. This last plea set up an unsatisfied and paramount lien on the property in favor of Carloss, or of Forbes & Carloss, of which firm Carloss was the surviving member. Carloss was: sued in the capacity…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Marston v. . SwettNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Montgomery Gas-Light Co. v. Montgomery & Eufaula Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  3. Heflin v. SlaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  4. Jonas v. FieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  5. Hardison v. PlummerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. McCaa v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. Hotel Tutwiler Operating Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  4. Howard v. PritchettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BassCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API