Legal Opinion

Matthew Matherne v. Houma Police Department, ET AL.

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided November 7, 2025No. 2:24-cv-01561Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MATTHEW MATHERNE CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 24-1561 HOUMA POLICE DEPARTMENT, ET AL. SECTION “I”(4) ORDER AND REASONS Pending before the Court is defendants Houma Police Department and Officer Matthew Henry’s (“Defendants”) Motion to Compel (ECF No. 29). Plaintiff Matthew Matherne (“Matherne”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, did not file any opposition and the time to file such has passed. See E.D. La. 7.5. The Court finds that oral argument is unnecessary for the reasons that follow. I. Background Matherne was a pretrial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bruce A. Coane v. Ferrara Pan Candy Company, Defendant/third-Party v. Three Brothers Bakery, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  2. Dawes v. CoughlinDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API