Legal Opinion
Pleasure v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 7, 2006No. 3D06-781PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
931 So.2d 1000 (2006)
Ladell M. PLEASURE, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D06-781.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 7, 2006.
Ladell M. Pleasure, in proper person.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee.
Before COPE, C.J., and SHEPHERD and ROTHENBERG, JJ.
COPE, C.J.
This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We reverse.
Ladell M. Pleasure filed a motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The trial court denied the motion for successiveness.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. McBrideSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Swain v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
3Cited by16 opinions
- Mims v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Holton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Jimenez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Garcia v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Gonzalez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.