Acevedo v. State

Appellant was convicted of trafficking in cocaine and assigns prosecutorial misconduct as error on appeal. We affirm.

For the transaction which led to appellant’s arrest, a police officer and an informant had waited for appellant at a restaurant. On deposition, the testimony of the *297police officer and the informant differed as to where the police officer was at the time appellant arrived. During the lunch break on the first day of trial, the assistant state attorney met with the police officer and the informant together and discussed the inconsistency in their testimony. This discussion was…