State v. Fisher
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 A jury found Kisha Fisher and Corey Trosclair guilty of first degree murder.1 Trosclair and Fisher appeal their convictions. In the published portion of the opinion, we hold that Trosclair’s rights under the confrontation clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution were violated because the redactions in a nontestifying codefendant’s statements were insufficient under current confrontation clause jurisprudence. But we hold further that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, although the trial court should have severed Trosclair’s case from…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Gray v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- State v. MedinaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State v. CottenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. FisherWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. FisherWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- Lisa Merie Conklin N/k/a Christensen v. Nicholas Frederick ConklinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State Of Washington, Resp. v. Mohamed A. Ahmed, App.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State v. FisherWashington Supreme Court · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.