Legal Opinion

Peterborough Corp. v. Karl Ehmer, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 22, 1995PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the production of the books and records of the respondent pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 624, the petitioner appeals from so much of an order and amended judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County (O’Donoghue, J.), dated February 23, 1994, as, upon a judgment of the same court, dated November 12, 1993, granting the petition only to the extent of directing the production by the respondent of certain corporate books and records for the 1992 fiscal year, and upon the appellant’s post-judgment motion for renewal and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crane Co. v. Anaconda Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Tatko v. Tatko Brothers Slate Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Sivin v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  4. In re LopezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Retirement Plan for Gen. Empls. of City of N. Miami Beach v. McGraw-Hill Cos., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Dwyer v. Di Nardo & Metschl, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Matter of Pokoik v. 575 Realties, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API