Legal Opinion

State v. Russell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 26, 2002No. 9911-39092; A112344PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Defendant was convicted of one count each of conspiracy to possess, conspiracy to manufacture, and conspiracy to deliver methamphetamine. Defendant also was convicted of the underlying crimes of possession, manufacture, and delivery of methamphetamine. On appeal, defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence as to the convictions for conspiracy to manufacture, conspiracy to deliver, manufacture, and delivery of methamphetamine. We reject that challenge without discussion.

The state, commendably, points out that the trial court erred in entering judgment on all counts because, under ORS…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gonzalo Dominguez v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. Gonzalo Dominguez v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. State v. RodveltCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. State v. RodveltCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API