Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Rice

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 12, 1975No. Docket No. 19354Published

1ConcurrenceAllen, P. J.

I concur in the result. I agree that because the trial court failed to inform the defendant of his right to a non-jury trial a new trial must be ordered. I do not agree that the failure of the prosecutor to be present in court and acknowledge the agreement mandates a new trial. Errors in the plea-taking process, broadly considered, may be classified as of two types. One type concerns the failure of the trial court to inform the defendant, prior to acceptance of the plea, of all the constitutional and statutory rights waived by a guilty plea. In such instances, the plea-taking judge accepts a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. ShekoskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. LeonardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. People v. Otha EdwardsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. People v. BrattonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API