Richard v. Richard
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WASSERSTROM, Judge.
The principal question presented is whether the evidence supports the finding of the Probate Court that appellant Edna E. Richard (“Edna”) is incompetent. We answer that question in the affirmative. We further hold that the admission of certain evidence of which complaint is made was nonprejudicial.
Edna at the time of the hearing before the Probate Court was 74 years of age. In February 1982 she entered the Boone County Hospital for open heart surgery, and on February 26, four coronary by-passes were performed. Her husband attempted to testify that following that operation,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Swope v. PrintzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
- N. K. M. v. L. E. M.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Pate v. St. Louis Independent Packing CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
- Petty v. FolsomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Goodson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- Disbrow v. BoehmerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Mathis v. GloverMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Keen v. DismukeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Steve F. Montoya, Jr., M.D., West Texas Renal Care and West Texas Nephrology v. San Angelo Community Medical Center and Kirk Brewer, M.D., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2016