Legal Opinion

Hyson v. General Fireproofing Supply Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 11, 1912PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Baltimore City Court (Doblee, J.).

1Opinion of the CourtBoyd, C. J.

The G-eneral Fire Proofing Company, a body corporate, sued “T. A. Hyson, trading as the Capital Eire Proofing Supply Company,” under the Pule Day Act of Baltimore City. The action was commenced on the 27th day of February, 1911, and, although the record does not show the return day, we *232suppose it was tbe second Monday, being tbe 13tb day of March — as that was tbe next return day after tbe suit was broug’bt. On March 24th tbe defendant made a motion for a rule security for costs, and it was ordered that tbe rule be laid,- unless cause to tbe contrary be shown on or before tbe 20th of April.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hutton v. MarxCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
  2. Laubheimer v. NaillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
  3. Adler v. CrookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
  4. Councilman v. Towson National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
  5. Gemmell v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lipscomb v. ZinkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API