Adams v. Helm
Supreme Court of Missouri
Error to Linn County Court of Common Pleas. I. Our statute (Wagn. Stat., 1041, § 13) does notallow the court to submit the whole issue to the jury.
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, Judge
This was an action in the nature of a bill in equity to compel the defendants to surrender and cancel certain notes secured by a deed of trust on a number of town lots, and to acknowledge satisfaction of the deed of trust.
The plaintiffs alleged in their petition, that the whole amount of all the notes secured by the deed of trust had been fully paid.
The defendant denied the allegation of payment, and alleged that a large amount was still unpaid. The defendant, Helm, further alleged in her answer, that the plaintiffs had delivered her certain notes,-secured by a deed of trust, as collateral…
2Cited by25 opinions
- McCormick v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
- Vilter Mfg. Co. v. RolaffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Pollman & Bros. Coal & Sprinkling Co. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- St. Joseph School Board ex rel. Donovon v. HullMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897
- Goffe v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1928
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.